Unbiblical Evangelicals: 25 January

‘I read everything else in the Bible now through the lens of Jesus, not the other way around. He’s the incarnate and so that’s my home.’

So writes Sarah Bessy commenting on Rachel Held Evans’ blog The Scandal of the Evangelical Heart. http://rachelheldevans.com/blog/scandal-evangelical-heart#comment-777014646

Rachel wrote that she is horrified at the apparent callousness of Evangelicals who are not troubled by the genocide in the book of Joshua, nor by the prospect of non-Christians being tormented forever in hell. They think that if that’s what the Bible says, it must be OK. It sounds horrible but it must be God’s will so there’s nothing to be worked up about. What is in these Evangelical hearts?

Sarah rightly points to the core of the problem – reading the Bible the wrong way. When you read ‘through the lens of Jesus’ you start knowing that cruelty and violence are wrong, enemies are to be loved not massacred and the love that flows from our hearts is supremely important. Anything that does not fit into what we know about and from Jesus is to be rejected or to be put on the shelf until we can integrate it with Jesus. Parts of Joshua fall into this category.

This ‘Jesus lens’ approach is the Biblical approach. (The technical term for ‘approach to reading the Bible, or other literature’ is ‘hermeneutic’. Just in case you have come across the word and wonder…) This is surprising because the Evangelicals who do not use the ‘Jesus lens’ think they are being entirely Biblical. They aren’t. Where does the Bible itself say that the Bible is to be read their way, treating all of it as equally authoritative? Nowhere. Where does the Bible itself say that the Bible is to be read with a ‘Jesus lens?’ Several passages in the New Testament.

Mark 9:5-7 recounts the Transfiguration:
Then Peter said to Jesus, `Rabbi, it is good for us to be here; let us make three dwellings, one for you, one for Moses, and one for Elijah.’ He did not know what to say, for they were terrified. Then a cloud overshadowed them, and from the cloud there came a voice, `This is my Son, the Beloved; listen to him!’ (NRSV)

A voice from heaven (what could be more authoritative than that?) tells them, and us, to listen to Jesus, not to Jesus alongside Moses and Elijah – ie not alongside the Old Testament. Jesus is the Son, not a prophet. He is of a completely different order. (Hebrews 1) Pay attention to him, him alone!

Jesus himself confirms this by saying that wise men hear his words and act on them – not the words of the Old Testament. (Mth. 7:24-27) Jesus said his disciples are to learn to obey all he commanded, not all Scripture. commanded. (Mth 28:20) Paul and Peter write that Jesus is the foundation and cornerstone. (1 Cor. 3:11, 1 Peter 2:6,7) You start the building with Jesus. If you start with Joshua you end up with a skewed building.

Jesus also said that we are to read the Old Testament entire and follow what it says. Jesus had a way of saying two almost contradictory things. We start with Jesus, listen to Jesus and then we look carefully at all of the Old Testament. Reading with a ‘Jesus lens’ is another way of saying the same thing.
.
Conservative Evangelicals object to the Jesus lens. The more theological say that it is illegitimate to form a ‘canon within the canon.’ The canon of the whole of Scripture is the main thing. It cannot be subdivided in any way. Where, though, does the Bible itself say this? The voice from heaven and the New Testament give a different message. Conservative Evangelicals are reading Scripture in an unbiblical way. This needs to be said more clearly and more often.

Further, the voice from heaven and the New Testament do not say ‘pay attention to the recorded sayings of Jesus’ but ‘Listen to him!’ The record of what he said is of great importance, but he is also alive and speaking today through the Holy Spirit. It is vital that we have a personal relationship with Jesus today, having our hearts warmed and healed by his, abiding in him, in his love. So Sarah Bessy writes: I just like to sit with my head resting on Jesus while I figure it out. That’s just what we are all supposed to do. It is the Holy Spirit who guides us into all truth, including telling us things that Jesus could not say before, (John 16:12-14) We read Scripture not only having read the Gospels but with Jesus with us, his heart and his mind alongside ours.

Has this Jesus lens, Jesus priority, been explained and argued elsewhere? I would love to know more. Has Gay Marriage been looked at fully with the Jesus lens, the Jesus priority? I am working on this at the moment and am keen to compare with others. Please comment.

If you want to know what happens when you use the Jesus lens to look at Hell, see The Lie of Hell http://www.laddermedia.co.uk You see that Jesus used two different words which have been translated by the one word ‘hell’ and that changes everything.

Roger Harper

Advertisements

Tags:

One Response to “Unbiblical Evangelicals: 25 January”

  1. The Bible and Authority | Gay Marriage Maybe Says:

    […] See also https://rogerharper.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/unbiblical-evangelicals-25-january/ […]

Please comment:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: